RBC’s $646M Morgan Stanley Hire Shows Why Florida Wealth Teams Are In Play

InvestmentNews reported that RBC Wealth Management hired the Thomasco Group from Morgan Stanley, adding a veteran-led team in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, that oversaw $646 million in client assets before the move.

The team is led by Edward Thomasco, managing director and senior portfolio manager. He was joined by Michele M. Cianfrone, vice president and senior business associate, and Taylor J. Boyle, senior financial associate. RBC Florida complex director Ken Ross said the group wanted direct access to local management and a collaborative culture that respected its entrepreneurial style.

That detail is the real story. This is not only another Morgan Stanley-to-RBC recruiting win. It is a Florida wealth management story. Palm Beach Gardens sits in one of the country’s most competitive wealth markets, where major brokerages, RIAs and regional firms compete for affluent retirees, business owners, executives, multigenerational families and clients with more complex planning needs.

For RBC, the Thomasco Group adds scale in a market where local relationships still matter. For Morgan Stanley, the departure shows how even large wirehouses can lose experienced teams when rivals offer a different mix of local access, planning resources and advisor autonomy.

For clients, the most important issue is practical: whether the move improves service, planning coordination and access to broader resources without creating confusion around paperwork, fees, banking referrals or account transitions.

TL;DR

  • RBC added the Thomasco Group from Morgan Stanley: The Palm Beach Gardens team oversaw $646 million in client assets before joining RBC.

  • Edward Thomasco leads the team: He serves as managing director, financial advisor and senior portfolio manager.

  • Michele Cianfrone and Taylor Boyle joined him: Cianfrone is vice president and senior business associate, while Boyle is senior financial associate and a CFP® professional.

  • The Florida angle matters: South Florida is a major wealth market where firms compete for affluent and ultrawealthy households.

  • RBC’s pitch is local access plus big-firm resources: The team cited local management access, collaborative culture, ultra-high-net-worth capabilities, planning associates and banking/lending resources.

  • Morgan Stanley’s risk is advisor optionality: Large firms still have brand power, but veteran teams can move when another platform feels more flexible.

  • The advisor takeaway: Recruiting decisions increasingly hinge on whether a platform helps advisors serve complex clients while preserving business control.

  • The client takeaway: Clients should ask what changes in account access, fees, reporting, banking referrals, service contacts and planning support after the move.

Palm Beach Gardens Is The Point Of The Story

The location is not background. It is part of the strategy.

Palm Beach Gardens is in a South Florida wealth corridor where demographics, tax migration, real estate wealth, family wealth transfer and business liquidity often converge. Large advisory teams in this region are not only managing portfolios. Many are helping clients coordinate retirement income, estate planning, business succession, charitable giving, lending, liquidity and family decision-making.

That makes advisor recruiting in South Florida different from a generic branch expansion. A firm has to show that it can support complex households without making the advisor-client relationship feel institutional or distant.

Why South Florida Teams Are Valuable

  • Affluent client density: Wealth firms want access to retirees, executives, entrepreneurs, professionals and multigenerational families.

  • Tax migration: Florida’s tax profile continues to attract clients who need relocation, residency and estate-planning coordination.

  • Real estate exposure: Many clients hold significant wealth in property, which can affect liquidity planning and portfolio design.

  • Family wealth transfer: Retirees and older business owners often need inheritance, trust, gifting and charitable strategies.

  • Competitive advisor market: Wirehouses, RIAs and regional firms all want established teams with deep local relationships.

That is why RBC’s Thomasco Group hire should be read as a targeted Florida move. The $646 million asset figure matters, but the local market makes the move more strategically valuable.

The Thomasco Group Gives RBC A Veteran-Led Relationship Team

The Thomasco Group is not being positioned as a newly assembled group. It is a veteran-led team with defined client-service roles.

Financial Advisor reported that Edward Thomasco began his career in 1990 with Lehman Brothers, moved to Citigroup Global Markets in 1993 and joined Morgan Stanley in 2009. That long tenure matters because clients often build trust with advisors over decades, not quarters.

RBC’s Thomasco Group page adds more detail about the support structure. Cianfrone brings more than 20 years of financial services experience and supports client experience, portfolio construction, wealth management planning and daily operational needs. Boyle joined the group in 2017 and focuses on client service, RBC digital tools and goals-based wealth planning.

Why The Support Roles Matter

  • Cianfrone strengthens continuity: Her operational and planning support can help preserve client experience during and after transition.

  • Boyle adds planning and digital support: A CFP® professional focused on digital tools and goals-based planning can help clients adapt to RBC systems.

  • Thomasco remains the relationship anchor: Longtime clients may judge the move by whether their lead advisor remains accessible and steady.

  • The team model reduces transition risk: Clients are less likely to feel lost when familiar service contacts move with the advisor.

  • Operational memory matters: Support staff often know client preferences, recurring paperwork issues, distribution schedules and communication habits.

A $646 million practice does not move only on the strength of one advisor. The full team structure helps determine whether assets follow.

RBC’s Pitch Is Boutique Access With A Larger Balance Sheet Behind It

RBC’s Florida recruiting message centers on a specific combination: local access, collaborative culture and broad platform resources.

That combination matters because experienced advisors often leave large firms when they believe another platform gives them more practical control. They may not want a smaller firm with fewer resources. They may want a large firm that feels less bureaucratic.

AdvisorHub reported that the Thomasco Group chose RBC because of its ultra-high-net-worth platform and resources, including planning associates and banking and lending specialists. That aligns with RBC’s broader platform message. RBC Wealth Management’s U.S. about page says the firm had $769 billion in total client assets and more than 2,200 financial advisors across the U.S. as of May 28, 2026.

What RBC Is Trying To Sell To Veteran Teams

  • Local management access: Advisors want decision-makers who understand their market and can resolve issues quickly.

  • Collaborative culture: Teams leaving a wirehouse often want less friction and more responsiveness.

  • UHNW resources: Wealthy clients may need lending, trust, estate, planning and family wealth support.

  • Brand stability: RBC can point to the financial strength of Royal Bank of Canada and its U.S. wealth platform.

  • Advisor autonomy: The recruiting pitch emphasizes flexibility to serve clients in the way the team believes is best.

The question is whether RBC can make those promises feel real after the transition. Advisors do not stay because a platform has resources. They stay because the resources are usable.

Florida Recruiting Is Becoming A Relationship-Control Contest

The Thomasco Group move fits a broader trend: firms are recruiting advisors by promising more control over the client relationship.

The industry used to talk about advisor moves mainly in terms of payout and signing packages. Those still matter. But veteran teams often focus on more durable issues: local leadership, client service, platform flexibility, planning resources, technology, banking access and succession support.

That is especially true in Florida, where many clients have complex personal balance sheets. A retired executive may need income planning, stock diversification, trust coordination and credit access. A business owner may need liquidity-event planning and family governance. A multigenerational family may need estate planning, charitable giving and beneficiary education.

What Advisors May Want More Control Over

  • Client experience: Teams want to shape meetings, reporting, planning cadence and service expectations.

  • Planning resources: Advisors need specialists who can support high-net-worth and ultra-high-net-worth work.

  • Operational decisions: Practice owners want fewer delays around account service and client requests.

  • Technology adoption: Teams want digital tools that help clients instead of creating administrative drag.

  • Banking referrals: Advisors serving wealthy clients may need lending and cash-management support.

  • Brand positioning: Local teams want to preserve their own identity inside a larger platform.

This is why a move like this can be more about practice control than dissatisfaction alone.

The Banking And Lending Angle Needs Careful Disclosure

Banking and lending resources can be useful for wealthy clients. They can help with liquidity, real estate, tax payments, business needs, concentrated positions and short-term cash needs. But bank-affiliated wealth platforms also create disclosure issues that clients should understand.

RBC’s Thomasco Group home page says Edward Thomasco may receive compensation from RBC Wealth Management for referring customers to City National Bank. It also says banking products and services are offered or issued by City National Bank, an affiliate of RBC Wealth Management, and that investment products are not FDIC insured, not guaranteed by City National Bank and may lose value.

That disclosure is important. It does not mean the banking relationship is bad. It means clients should know when a recommendation involves an affiliated bank and whether the advisor or firm may receive compensation.

What Clients Should Understand About Bank-Linked Wealth Advice

  • Banking products are different from investment products: Deposit and lending products carry different protections and risks.

  • Referral compensation can create conflicts: Clients should know when an advisor or firm may benefit from a referral.

  • Credit can help or hurt: Securities-based lending and other credit tools can solve liquidity needs but add risk if markets move.

  • Planning should come first: A loan, credit line or banking product should fit the client’s plan, not the platform’s revenue goals.

  • Disclosures should be plain: Clients should not have to decode legal language to understand how the firm is paid.

A strong advisor can use banking resources responsibly. A strong platform makes the disclosures clear.

The Client Strategies Team Shows RBC’s Planning Depth

One reason RBC may appeal to teams like Thomasco is the specialist layer behind the advisor.

RBC’s Thomasco Group page lists a Client Strategies Team that supports financial advisors with complex planning issues. The page describes support across investment management, estate planning services, credit solutions, insurance and annuity strategies, professional trustee services, trust consulting, retirement solutions, capital markets engagement and banking solutions.

That kind of support matters in a market like Palm Beach Gardens. Clients with large portfolios often have problems that do not fit neatly into an asset-allocation meeting. They may need to plan around taxes, trusts, heirs, stock concentration, lending, insurance, retirement income and charitable goals at the same time.

Where Specialist Support Can Change The Client Experience

  • Estate planning coordination: A wealth strategist can help align the advisor’s work with attorneys and accountants.

  • Trust planning: Trust consultants can support clients who need professional trustee options or trust-asset guidance.

  • Credit solutions: Wealth bankers can help evaluate liquidity needs without forcing immediate portfolio sales.

  • Insurance and annuities: Specialists can help review risk-transfer tools in a planning context.

  • Retirement planning: Retirement consultants can support income, distribution and employer-plan conversations.

  • Concentrated equity planning: Specialists can help clients think through diversification, charitable giving and tax timing.

The advisor remains central, but complex planning often requires a team behind the team.

Morgan Stanley’s Loss Is Part Of A Larger Wirehouse Rotation

Morgan Stanley remains one of the largest and most powerful wealth management firms in the industry. One team departure does not change that.

But the Thomasco Group move shows how the wirehouse recruiting market keeps rotating. RBC has been recruiting from Morgan Stanley, UBS and other large rivals. At the same time, Morgan Stanley has also recruited from competitors, including major UBS teams.

This is the reality of modern advisor movement: large firms can win and lose teams at the same time.

Why Wirehouse Teams Keep Moving

  • Platform fit changes over time: A team that once fit one firm may later need different resources or flexibility.

  • Leadership access matters: Advisors may leave if they feel decisions are too centralized or slow.

  • Client complexity grows: As clients become wealthier, teams may need deeper specialist support.

  • Recruiting economics remain aggressive: Rivals can make financially attractive transition offers.

  • Cultural fit is personal: Advisors may prefer the feel of one firm even if both platforms are large and capable.

The Thomasco Group move should not be read as a verdict on Morgan Stanley. It is a sign that veteran advisors keep reassessing whether their platform matches the practice they want to build.

RBC’s Florida Pattern Has Been Building For Years

This was not RBC’s first push in Florida.

RBC Wealth Management announced in 2022 that it added roughly $1 billion in Florida recruiting assets, welcoming four advisors and their teams from Truist in Boca Raton. Ross said at the time that Florida was “ripe with opportunity” and that RBC was continuing to grow its footprint in the region with top-tier advisors and support staff.

That older announcement helps frame the Thomasco hire. RBC’s Florida recruiting is not just opportunistic. It reflects a multi-year attempt to build density in high-wealth Florida markets.

NJ Financial News also recently covered how RBC’s $660 million UBS hire in Los Angeles was really a complex-client planning play. The geography is different, but the theme is similar: RBC is recruiting teams that can use larger planning, banking and wealth resources while still presenting a strong local relationship model.

What A Multi-Year Florida Strategy Can Build

  • Branch credibility: More high-producing teams can make RBC more visible in local wealth circles.

  • Referral networks: Advisors can build deeper connections with attorneys, accountants, bankers and business advisers.

  • Client-service density: More teams can justify stronger local management, service and specialist support.

  • Recruiting momentum: One successful transition can make future recruits more comfortable.

  • Regional identity: RBC can become more than an outside national brand if it builds enough local presence.

That is why Palm Beach Gardens matters. It is not just one branch. It is part of a regional wealth strategy.

The Same Roundup Shows Three Different Advisor Frictions

The InvestmentNews article also covered two other advisor moves, and they help explain the broader market.

Merrill added a Providence, Rhode Island-based UBS team led by Robert Procaccianti, Jared Tack and Doug Bennet, with $805 million in client assets and 75 years of combined industry experience. Cetera added Gregory Kearney in Westport, Connecticut, after 23 years affiliated with LPL, with about $160 million in assets under administration.

Those moves were different from RBC’s Thomasco hire, but they show the same industry churn. Advisors are not moving for one universal reason. Each move reflects a different friction point.

Move

Prior Firm

New Firm

Reported Assets

Likely Strategic Angle

Thomasco Group

Morgan Stanley

RBC

$646 million

Local access, UHNW resources and Florida market growth

Procaccianti/Tack/Bennet team

UBS

Merrill

$805 million

New England high-net-worth coverage and wirehouse-to-wirehouse recruiting

Gregory Kearney

LPL

Cetera

$160 million AUA

Independent broker-dealer fit, OSJ relationships and operating flexibility

Why Roundup Context Matters

  • Wirehouse-to-wirehouse moves remain active: Advisors still move between major brands when another platform feels better.

  • Independent-channel movement is also active: Kearney’s LPL-to-Cetera move shows operating-model concerns inside broker-dealer networks.

  • Local markets drive decisions: Palm Beach Gardens, Providence and Westport each carry different client and advisor dynamics.

  • Client assets follow trust: The platform matters, but the advisor relationship still drives transition success.

  • Recruiting is becoming more segmented: Firms must tailor their pitch to the advisor’s client base, not just offer generic resources.

That makes the Thomasco move part of a larger advisor-choice cycle.

Client Transition Is Where The Move Becomes Real

A recruiting announcement is not the finish line. It is the start of the client transition.

Clients must decide whether to follow their advisor, move assets, open new online access, sign new documents, review disclosures and understand any changes in reporting or service. For a $646 million practice, the transition must be clear and organized.

The smoother the process, the easier it is for clients to focus on the reason for the move rather than the inconvenience of the move.

Questions Clients Should Ask After A Morgan Stanley-To-RBC Move

  • Will my advisory fees or account costs change?

  • Will all of my holdings transfer to RBC, or will some require review?

  • Will I receive new account numbers, statements or online login credentials?

  • Will the same team members continue serving me?

  • Will RBC offer new planning, banking, lending or trust resources?

  • Are there new affiliated-bank referral arrangements I should understand?

  • Will my tax reporting or cost-basis information move accurately?

  • What deadlines do I need to meet if I want to follow the team?

Clients do not need industry jargon. They need a simple explanation of what changes, what stays the same and what action is required.

Compliance And Transition Risk Sit Under Every Large Team Move

Advisor recruiting always has a compliance layer.

When a team leaves one large firm for another, client privacy, solicitation rules, account-transfer procedures, disclosure delivery, recordkeeping and communication review all matter. The receiving firm wants assets to move quickly. The prior firm wants to retain clients. The advisor wants to explain the transition without violating obligations or confusing clients.

That pressure can create risk if the process is rushed.

What Firms Have To Get Right

  • Client information handling: Advisors must follow rules around what client information can be used or transferred.

  • Transition communication: Letters, emails, calls and talking points should be accurate and reviewed.

  • Account paperwork: Forms must match client registrations, beneficiaries, account types and investment instructions.

  • Product review: Some investments may not transfer cleanly or may require new suitability or best-interest review.

  • Fee disclosure: Clients should understand any pricing or service change before committing.

  • Banking disclosures: Affiliated-bank referrals and compensation arrangements should be explained clearly.

  • Recordkeeping: Both firms must preserve required communications and account records.

A clean transition protects the advisor’s credibility. A messy one can turn a recruiting win into a client-service problem.

What RBC Still Has To Prove After Landing The Team

RBC won the headline, but the harder work comes next.

The firm must help the Thomasco Group retain clients, use RBC’s specialist resources effectively and make the move feel like an upgrade rather than a disruption. It must also show that its local-access promise is more than recruiting language.

For Morgan Stanley, the question is whether it can retain affected clients and prevent similar departures in comparable Florida markets.

Watchpoints After The Thomasco Transition

  • Client asset retention: How much of the $646 million follows the team and remains after the transition?

  • Service continuity: Do clients continue working smoothly with Thomasco, Cianfrone and Boyle?

  • Specialist usage: Does the team actually use RBC’s planning, lending, trust and wealth strategies resources?

  • Florida recruiting momentum: Does the hire help RBC attract more South Florida advisors?

  • Morgan Stanley response: Does the prior firm retain a meaningful share of clients or reinforce local advisor retention?

  • Disclosure clarity: Are banking, lending and investment-product disclosures clear for clients?

  • Technology adoption: Do RBC’s digital tools improve the client experience or create friction?

Those questions matter because advisor recruiting is judged after the announcement, not during it.

Bottom Line: RBC’s Florida Win Is About Wealth-Market Positioning

RBC’s recruitment of the Thomasco Group is a clear win. The team brought a reported $646 million in client assets from Morgan Stanley and strengthened RBC’s presence in Palm Beach Gardens.

But the better story is market positioning. South Florida is one of the most competitive wealth management battlegrounds in the country. Experienced teams serving affluent and ultrawealthy households need more than a recognizable brand. They need local leadership access, planning resources, banking and lending support, operational help and enough flexibility to serve clients their way.

For RBC, the Thomasco hire supports a broader pitch: a firm can have the strength of a global financial institution while still offering a branch culture that feels local. For Morgan Stanley, the move is a reminder that advisor loyalty can be tested when rivals present a different combination of autonomy and resources.

For clients, the key question is practical. Does the move make advice clearer, service smoother and planning stronger? That is what will decide whether the recruiting win becomes a lasting relationship win.

Frequently Asked Questions About RBC Hiring The Thomasco Group From Morgan Stanley

  1. Who Did RBC Hire From Morgan Stanley In Florida?

    RBC Wealth Management hired the Thomasco Group from Morgan Stanley in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. The team oversaw $646 million in client assets before joining RBC.

  2. Who Leads The Thomasco Group?

    The Thomasco Group is led by Edward Thomasco, managing director, financial advisor and senior portfolio manager. He was joined by Michele M. Cianfrone, vice president and senior business associate, and Taylor J. Boyle, senior financial associate and CFP® professional.

  3. Why Did The Thomasco Group Join RBC?

    The team’s move was framed around access to local management, collaborative culture, entrepreneurial flexibility and RBC’s ultra-high-net-worth resources. AdvisorHub and Financial Advisor both reported that RBC’s planning associates and banking and lending specialists were part of the appeal.

  4. Why Is Palm Beach Gardens Important To The Story?

    Palm Beach Gardens is part of a competitive South Florida wealth corridor where brokerages and RIAs compete for affluent and ultrawealthy households. The market can involve retirees, business owners, executives, real estate-heavy families and multigenerational clients with complex planning needs.

  5. What Should Clients Ask After Their Advisor Moves Firms?

    Clients should ask whether fees, account access, statements, service contacts, investment holdings, planning resources, banking referrals or disclosures will change. They should also ask what paperwork they need to complete and whether the same advisory team will continue serving them.

Further Reading

Charles Cooke

Charles Cooke is a New Jersey native and reporter covering financial news, business developments, fintech, banking, and regulatory updates. His reporting focuses on the people, companies, and institutions shaping the financial sector, with an emphasis on clear, timely coverage of market activity, corporate announcements, and emerging trends.

https://x.com/LetCharlesCooke
Previous
Previous

A $2B Private Wealth Duo Left Fifth Third For LPL. The Bigger Story Is Control

Next
Next

LPL Bought Commonwealth. Then 653 Advisors Walked Away.